Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2023 13:10:08 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258594] [NEW PORT] databases/keydb: Key-value storage, SMP-enabled redis fork Message-ID: <bug-258594-7788-bNC2X374Z2@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-258594-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-258594-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258594 --- Comment #7 from emz@norma.perm.ru --- I totally don't understand why should I bother about this: the discussion h= as stalled; the amount of requests to "improve" the port submitted relies enti= rely to the person commiting/reviewing, from "none, do you want me to commit thi= s or not ?" (yup, I have some buddies port-commiters) to "okay, now you need to = test whether this runs fine on NanoBSD mfsbd distribution". This was mainly an experiment to determine whether one can really propose to add new port without engaging his FreeBSD community connections; seems like= one can not. BTW significant part of the currently maintained ports (nah, I won= 't point out) don't meet criterias this port has met. THis (and the port, yup) workd for me, so anyone willing to revive this end= less quest should merely resubmit. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-258594-7788-bNC2X374Z2>