From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 00:42:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5FC1065676 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from balrogg@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BD48FC19 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 00:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from balrogg@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1380354rvf.43 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:42:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=fU0CAFPlfE7lJJliKg0x5qw0hlHcvmWd70ag/UUnCoE=; b=r3OHfOfGALucYf4C1p56a/s4e2HOv4S85mmAF5WI5woyfpRXcB0AfQ7ZvH0roxGP2y jTorKm770e4mVwD1R8Pzk8p+0ADWFm85HMSgIxnmaBoW7IcxLfAPC/sYcvqWiPMsu5HV SaB052r+qz8URyth+0pENKi+tWwKkutzEH40o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=cvpBf5jjpM60ZK4gyv1lcnRrUfpdl5wvmNBBVX5A/jzX7OxD+WsLtKYg4V16Pf5Lq8 l1/LdfORDVOHleYp/yzBh3AsJA+ad/SjMumS1xEy0fv2V/cB86xofzLxc1TR/VQvav/N 0x0mgbrcSnBQpcykmOtV3JJYt2DIpqk35dlxA= Received: by 10.141.162.6 with SMTP id p6mr2108684rvo.136.1226104974224; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.1.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:42:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:42:54 +0100 From: "andrzej zaborowski" To: balrogg@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20081108003904.GA34804@saturn.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081107214438.GA27376@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <200811080018.mA80I9Xl033878@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20081108003904.GA34804@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Cc: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] first tests of qemu svn r5646 on FreeBSD - usb still slow, bsd-user doesn't build, some warnings... X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:42:54 -0000 2008/11/8 Juergen Lock : > On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 01:18:09AM +0100, I wrote: >> In article you write: >> >2008/11/7 Juergen Lock : >> >> I just prepared another experimental emulators/qemu-devel port update, >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20081107.patch >> > >> >Great. >> > >> >> I haven't tested it that much yet (you are welcome to help there! :) >> >> but so far didn't notice much changes compared to last time (r5499), >> >> usb is still slow with my Linux 2.6.26 guest (probably to be expected, >> >> nothing committed there since.) >> > >> >Could you test with the patch in >> >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-10/msg01326.html ? >> >Max Krasnyanski supposed it may contain the fix, I had no time to test >> >it yet. >> >> Maybe you should, because I can't get that patch to work here, neither >> -usbdevice net:.. nor adding it or a disk: later (via usb_add) works, >> I can't talk to any of them. I even tried rmmod uhci_hcd (in that >> Linux 2.6.26 guest again) in case it might have been in the way, but >> no go... >> >> And now I tried a FreeBSD 7.1 beta guest with usb_add disk: (net: never >> worked with FreeBSD guests for me), that guest also didn't see it. >> >> Maybe you have more luck... >> Juergen > > I forgot to say I had to manually kill a few stray newlines in that > patch, even tho I grabbed it out of my local list archive that doesn't > mangle posts. Maybe there was more damage? Ah, nope, it changes the default usb host for PC to ehci.. that's not the change I wanted to test. Anyway, it seems the change I had in mind is in the passthrough code so it can't fix the regression in emulated devices.. sorry, I had not read the patch fully. Cheers