Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:42:30 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el Message-ID: <20140310144230.GI11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org> References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org> <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org> <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org> <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org> <3D82157DD87FC9C0C7724278@ogg.in.absolight.net> <20140310141659.GG11135@gahrfit.gahr.ch> <20140310143515.GB92282@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--I/5syFLg1Ed7r+1G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2014-Mar-10, 14:35, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 03:16:59PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > > ports-policy-change-announce@ comes to mind :) Has anybody else ever fe= lt > > the desire to get notified whenever a policy is updated? Just to avoid > > having to skim through commit logs. >=20 > It's getting a bit ridiculuos, no? >=20 > Guys, nothing was discussed thus far which does not come naturally from > common sense. Certainly there are few special cases that require deeper > analysis (e.g. proper, legally-clean LICENSE handling), but from what I > see, most of "please don't/do this-or-that" stuff comes from negligence > rather than deliberate dissent from PHB or common practices. If every > committer would review *entire* Makefile before 'svn ci', there would > be presumably less messages on the lists. :) Common sense is not as common as you might think / wish, especially when we're talking about style. In this particular case - whether or not to mute mkdir - I don't think one could come up with really convincing arguments, either pro or con. Let's just 1) pick a convention, 2) stick to it, and 3) take measures so everybody can be made aware of it. I'm worried about this 3rd part. --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --I/5syFLg1Ed7r+1G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTHc9SXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQTZERTEwNkE1Qjg1NEI4NUREODZENDlB REQwRDM4RUExOTIwODlFAAoJEK3Q046hkgie/uYP/3kwpfMyg16+1wYPLSPWJV/f YjJS5BF3jJFAGqExi0WYtiROKxdH0wAMir/tYE1a8/6pr5N/Uf9gTLnS3/M7YeOS d0kmWn5dYtiDKn3vjSlpeAHTQNnF0pv4GQMNGjtTxR/MRo8FrYS/AZCiOMYz3oA1 nYIcjuqokJ92WFfk3uhKv2qO7q3G92bnT/wjuX1KAsO8gcixsjuW8WXV570Rktj5 OqdZzg1RG5kHEMUkQYZKmWtYEMaHoY2sSRTZjLJfESrqzJLKrSsr2zD1wchjh60w CmrQ+Op71ecE3VgZ+VLIvXQO4h+TDoXrh2xeCyvczR1HM90iYn7MNj9UGikdh/eY 4F0qBNwdnc0xzzHebRo1ouS7YTiPwsGryi4/ijpqrs10pNlgVWQ8LgwEIJcBM6FI thI1qUFLwoVEabZp7xPcH5KXsZ5K4EzcbuPyyRe2B9+vs1Flid0SgEWegLYJ6dcd yJqHzUQyogH4IyOFrCP3SaRbEdWDROqCMNiRj1R0QaIGUxFVsYsiC/g1k0rq45uO yBCIQdGj47v97izczEEEwqZ8SoQBUz9P8rmwh4KuhAUSFZJgBhjiqve95TouYgk6 2mdPWZEYI3IuUnBTNPO5hlhXNEaROnD0xsbBK0y7YAds8MVWQBrgZELafgiKp54J T6JWkfnP8pK/NyoGD4iO =dbIa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I/5syFLg1Ed7r+1G--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140310144230.GI11135>