From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed May 20 12:23:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA04802 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Wed, 20 May 1998 12:23:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA04710 for ; Wed, 20 May 1998 12:22:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21396; Wed, 20 May 1998 12:22:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Emmanuel Gravel cc: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the PentiumII processor In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 May 1998 11:35:48 PDT." <3562C014.36712FD@elr346.ateng.az.honeywell.com> Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 12:22:55 -0700 Message-ID: <21393.895692175@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > What's the status on compatibility between the two? If I want to get > a dual PII 400 system, as an example, will FreeBSD support it fully? > What would potential problems be? 1. They work just great. 2. If you're willing to ride out on the bleeding edge with a 3.0 SNAP, dual will work fine also (otherwise just get a single CPU for now and wait until October). - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message