From owner-cvs-all Sat Sep 16 16:21:39 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from ducky.nz.freebsd.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2242A37B424; Sat, 16 Sep 2000 16:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ducky.nz.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA17226; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:21:34 +1200 (NZST) Message-Id: <200009162321.LAA17226@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: langille.org To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:21:31 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/xlines Makefile ports/games/xlines/patches patch-aa Reply-To: dan@langille.org References: <20000916180157.P84360@FreeBSD.org> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 16 Sep 2000, at 16:16, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Portrevision is used when the end product changes in such a way that > people may want to know about the newer version and update. So if you > modify a patch such that it functionally affects the binary, you should > bump it - whether or not the patch is new is immaterial. And doesn't pkg_version use this information? If so, people would never know about the upgrade/path unless they were on this list. Of course, they could be subscribed to FreshPorts, and have xlines on their watch list.... -- Dan Langille The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/ FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message