From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 27 15:02:52 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A411065672
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sson@freebsd.org)
Received: from www.son.org (son.org [199.239.233.23])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AAC8FC17
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 May 2009 15:02:51 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sson@freebsd.org)
Received: from NextStepNG.son.org (adsl-76-203-228-11.dsl.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net
	[76.203.228.11]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by www.son.org (8.13.6.20060614/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n4REc9p3050228;
	Wed, 27 May 2009 09:38:09 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4A1D5050.4030207@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:38:08 -0500
From: Stacey Son <sson@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>
References: <a31046fc0905270137w2e505f1bxc4e3cf6347176708@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0905270137w2e505f1bxc4e3cf6347176708@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r192853
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:02:52 -0000

pluknet wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It is interesting that lockstat facility first appeared in stable/7
> as part of dtrace MFC in Aug/2008, and then only now in -current.
> Was it intentional or some mistake occasionally happen?
>   

That was unintentional...   Some of the earlier lockstat  provider bits 
were included in the MFC but weren't functional.

Best Regards,

-stacey.