From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Tue Feb 12 16:53:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD1114ECD07; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x42a.google.com (mail-pf1-x42a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 756F26E441; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x42a.google.com with SMTP id q1so1566162pfi.5; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:53:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=H9a533TsW97GzAUe34AWVyKZTUv8TAcS8s6b4BFfino=; b=NhIRFyIzXtgxquFDFGZlgbpF6QKGYOiWuJPbF2v5UwW6XjyyDUdo25k5hpxkJB1+5k Ey4cuDnUho9PM1pS9EMZNQ+ufjJOwdQxYcmJWm/nLUk7QsuJ+Dkw9t7iIe4EIJ2VihcI DjyevJBs3dt6NbYpwp7TLWHPD1av2xopavl6LexfzOXeXQS5QNP37yt9WyiUxZGjv/MJ Z0YL4JI08VG+idvkXJnuA/GuIsq5Af0KiEaxqrEOxlf+JmuNLbyiNSicAH7tff/pDZq+ S4e3uLpOS2nd+H+koFEJAOgXhb1iRrst8JRQAxmk8fQv8zdGYzZxadvSFS87uxB6VFro dTVQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=H9a533TsW97GzAUe34AWVyKZTUv8TAcS8s6b4BFfino=; b=poujhJ4TNjLUa4rUnw6amQLyna0Z9BSz3m2wTYIEij5trch0WFbsJNIQubeZrsE/YR vgMAG1kvvhqlewKwEDpMgegiwG+X42EtC5EA4gxTkehY/uHmP9BZDmhSqE+jNuqya670 p1Izhsv1K6VAc+mUIVw+PDuNgvg801M7r1jokOB23dku+C42tA3Lm/wWFEr3jPTaiH9K DtDX90kGda9gSb2GdX9Q23ZMgOFVVkzFegkk5QSEFZbxrjxgdPzXAjevW6mYVrX4QgIM 31JAjx7OLJrL3DfdZ4cxvqDy6+i0NCE3xcZ7k5XdxHgI5XWcO7FDneAe8uxRKRM7soi5 adHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYDM7o+SEbikR9GTurQ01DybUlevC8znGgo+GhccuSprR2Bdqs4 vy/VUQQt8sK8gEraWvxb9fcOi5TK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IY2xl2wgCNLudNW6QMOFPL4XUkEJY4195tPOsyjeDeL5iEti/NSs6AVgx12ATi8KkIjzVLZ6A== X-Received: by 2002:a63:8f45:: with SMTP id r5mr4399678pgn.222.1549990390858; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2607:fb90:a695:22c1:409c:1f73:a1ae:a38e? ([2607:fb90:a695:22c1:409c:1f73:a1ae:a38e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u66sm30584295pfi.115.2019.02.12.08.53.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:53:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: svn commit: r344051 - in stable/12/sbin: newfs tunefs From: Enji Cooper X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C104) In-Reply-To: <201902121644.x1CGisIg070475@slippy.cwsent.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:53:08 -0800 Cc: Warner Losh , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Dmitry Morozovsky , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-12@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201902121644.x1CGisIg070475@slippy.cwsent.com> To: Cy Schubert X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 756F26E441 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.93 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.94)[-0.941,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:53:13 -0000 > On Feb 12, 2019, at 08:44, Cy Schubert wrote: ... > Agreed. No rules need to be changed. It's not a big deal. At the time=20 > the question was about, something was missed or someone did something=20 > that they didn't have authority to do. The question was answered a=20 > couple of hours ago. We can stop bikeshedding this to try to create=20 > more rules when none are required. It was a simple, who authorized this=20= > commit? We got our answer. Let's move on. I agree with others that=E2=80=94unless the process is automated and applied= automatically without one thinking about it=E2=80=94let=E2=80=99s not imple= ment yet another bit of unnecessary (to remember) process. Otherwise, I fear= the committer=E2=80=99s guide will become as complicated as US law. This was a simple mistake/omission. Let=E2=80=99s move on. Thank you, -Enji=