From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Feb 28 11:11:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DE2CF12E9; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7798DB54; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BD80162; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:11:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 05:11:30 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r434867 - in head: biology/avida biology/gmap devel/k8048 devel/kyra devel/php-uprofiler multimedia/libde265 net-mgmt/fastnetmon Message-ID: <20170228111130.GB8021@lonesome.com> References: <201702261256.v1QCufsh008639@repo.freebsd.org> <8a75178e-f8b8-e52c-b118-c6781ed5393e@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8a75178e-f8b8-e52c-b118-c6781ed5393e@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 11:11:32 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 09:36:00AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Shouldn't they be marked as ONLY_FOR_ARCH=i386 amd64 instead of listing > all arches that are not those two ? I'm assuming (hoping?) there is some internal configure or Makefile step that I don't grok in each of these ports that can turn off the optimization. I'm reserving ONLY_FOR for ones where it's clear they can never run on anything but x86. Let me know if I've missed one. mcl