Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:17:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: dwcjr@inethouston.net (David W. Chapman Jr.), jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra), sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1 Message-ID: <200105180917.f4I9Hv929674@vega.vega.com> In-Reply-To: <20010518020644.A71658@dragon.nuxi.com> from "David O'Brien" at May 18, 2001 02:06:44 AM
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 05:57:52PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > > Because some people are still weary of 2.2.0 due to the massive changes in > > it while 2.0.9 has been around a while. It doesn't matter to me how it > > happens, but we should atleast keep around 2.0.9 for a while and 2.2.0 isn't > > alpha anymore so it should not be samba-devel > > `samba' should be the lastest release, period. That means 2.2.0. > For those afraid of it, repo copy the exiting 2.0.9 to samba20, with a > plan to cvs rm it in 3 mo. > > All this numbered ports crap just confuses the hell out of users. IMO net/samba and net/samba20 will confuse users even more, as it is not clear from the first glance whether samba > samba20 or not. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105180917.f4I9Hv929674>