From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Mar 22 22:41:00 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA08278
          for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 22:41:00 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id WAA08139
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 22:40:40 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com)
Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.186.218] 
	by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.82 #4)
	id 0yH0uS-0000NS-00; Sun, 22 Mar 1998 22:40:36 -0800
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 22:40:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
To: Mark Mayo <mark@vmunix.com>
cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: state of NFS in -stable ?
In-Reply-To: <19980323004623.47042@vmunix.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980322223801.18777A-100000@shell.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Mark Mayo wrote:

> Hi all. I was just curious if the round of changes to NFS (specifically
> the client) by John Dyson in -CURRENT made it back into -STABLE??

  I doubt it, as these changes caused some *serious* problems in current.
They would likely require extension changes to even apply to stable,
assuming that they are relevant.

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message