From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 11 23:48:24 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386231065670;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:48:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: from palm.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:613:100::211])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19D78FC13;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by palm.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1FAFB1CC94; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:48:23 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:48:23 +0200
From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To: ddk ddk <ddkprog@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20090911234823.GW2829@hoeg.nl>
References: <20090911155001.GU2829@hoeg.nl>
	<898308.64226.qm@web59103.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/DY0TM5dkgdNyMY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <898308.64226.qm@web59103.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: swell.k@gmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, delphij@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vesa(4) and amd64
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:48:24 -0000


--s/DY0TM5dkgdNyMY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

* ddk ddk <ddkprog@yahoo.com> wrote:
> if you do the same but on another ttyvX (/dev/ttyv1 .../dev/ttyv9)
> then there is no problem

I suspect this has something to do with the fact that the screen buffer
for window 0 is differently allocated than the other ones, because it
has to be statically allocated to work very early on...

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

--s/DY0TM5dkgdNyMY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkqq4ccACgkQ52SDGA2eCwWMOgCfaDmhtoJ2J0rvwaycr46Jumez
CUoAnR5wqw/IbhIO4XZ3qPuR3y3i7gCy
=BiP6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s/DY0TM5dkgdNyMY--