From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 10 14:19:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE4816A420 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89A613C4E1 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUF00NJLMGR1UT0@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:19:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0AEJc4f000246; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:19:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:19:38 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <478628BA.3000801@bsdforen.de> To: Dominic Fandrey Message-id: <4786297A.6000900@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 References: <89916.1199966906@critter.freebsd.dk> <47861705.2030609@gmail.com> <20080110135420.GA10955@freebie.xs4all.nl> <478628BA.3000801@bsdforen.de> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:19:41 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: >> As far as I'm concerned: if a license like that comes to core for >> a vote I would vote "No". >> >> This thread seems to move from the concerns our German friends >> have into a licensing debate. I feel it would be better if we >> could get back on track here. >> > > Agreed, this was never intended to become a license discussion. If > changing the license would be the only solution, I would rather > live with the problems than solving them. It is not the only solution but it is the best long term one IMO - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhil6jRvRjGmHRgQRAvROAJ96t0kRRVwfMuoelt8LZesW5rcvmgCeLAWt gRXfBc/ubyUBj5ZWvcNc1mU= =tb7z -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----