From owner-cvs-all Tue Mar 4 15:45: 6 2003 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D59437B48F; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7880343FCB; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:44:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h24NiwVa052824; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:44:58 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.8/8.12.6/Submit) id h24Niwh3052823; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:44:58 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 02:44:58 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Mike Barcroft , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5 Message-ID: <20030304234458.GA52774@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030303103819.GA22044@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303115011.GA8705@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303120707.GA24280@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303122609.GA9305@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030303130643.GA25214@nagual.pp.ru> <20030303112151.E49156@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030303164828.GA28881@nagual.pp.ru> <20030304212957.GA40993@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030304222055.GA51866@nagual.pp.ru> <20030304224127.GA41606@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030304224127.GA41606@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 14:41:27 -0800, David Schultz wrote: > The minpassword* capabilities were intentionally removed, so > they're probably not coming back. But I guess it doesn't hurt to > add them to a list of other things that don't exist, for the sake > of PicoBSD if nothing else. I'll take care of that. > > Regarding PAM, I'm still not sure what part you think is unclear. > Could you post a patch of what you're thinking of, perhaps to doc@? Reading manpage again I think I find simpler solution: if we move minpassword* capabilities to the "Not supported in the base" list, we don't need to mention PAM at all, i.e. we can safely remove all PAM references. PAM here is merely for description in what way they are "not supported", so mentioning of it gains nothing for describing LOGIN_CAP library functionlality. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message