From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Jan 27 17:10: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C1037B404 for ; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:09:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19); Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:07:58 -0800 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0S19xq81423; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:09:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 17:09:59 -0800 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: Ben Jackson , Kal Torak , FreeBSD-stable Subject: Re: ipfw forwarding Message-ID: <20010127170959.N10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu References: <200101272136.f0RLavv28020@saturn.home.ben.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from veldy@veldy.net on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 05:37:20PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 05:37:20PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > What if you don't run NAT? My network is bridged, so I don't run > NATD. Forwarding ports is a pain in the arse - since it does not appear > to work with ipfw. I have had to use "socket" with inetd. Something like 'bounce?' /usr/ports/net/bounce There are others in /usr/ports/net that do this kind of thing as well. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@alum.mit.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message