From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 12 16:49:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD9616A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:49:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (main.ciam.ru [213.147.57.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2D243D2D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2004 16:49:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sem@ciam.ru)
Received: from ppp144-166.dialup.mtu-net.ru ([62.118.144.166] helo=ciam.ru)
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.x)
	id 1B1xLE-000KnN-Ns
	for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:49:29 +0300
Message-ID: <40525AA4.5090104@ciam.ru>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 03:49:40 +0300
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "proxy.ciam.ru",
	hasmessageblock	similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
	the administrator of that system for details.INDEX
	and INDEX-5? I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5.
	What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x?
	The ports tree is the same anyway. [...] 
	Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
	pts rule name              description
	--------------------------------------------------
	2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK      RBL: Sent directly from dynamic IP address
	[62.118.144.166 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
	0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS          RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS
	[62.118.144.166 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
Subject: INDEX vs. INDEX-5
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 00:49:35 -0000

May be the question is silly but why we have both INDEX and INDEX-5?

I've found no ways to place 5.x-only port into INDEX-5.

What is difference to build INDEX on 4.x machine and INDEX-5 on 5.x? The
ports tree is the same anyway.

--
Sem.