From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Oct 22 10:35:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rnocserv.urc.ac.ru (rnocserv.urc.ac.ru [193.233.85.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD2837B4F9 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 10:35:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from belle.RNOC-dialup.urc.ac.ru (belle.RNOC-dialup.urc.ac.ru [193.233.85.126]) by rnocserv.urc.ac.ru (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9MHZ9599711; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:35:10 +0600 (YEKST) (envelope-from anton@urc.ac.ru) Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:35:09 +0600 (YEKST) From: Anton Voronin X-Sender: anton@belle.rnoc-dialup.urc.ac.ru To: Jeremy Norris Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HAVE_GTK and HAVE_GNOME In-Reply-To: <20001022120953.A1458@babylon.merseine.nu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Jeremy Norris wrote: > If I understand the knew USE_GTK/USE_GNOME parameters correctly, you shouldn't > need to define anything in /etc/make.conf to add gnome support to ports you're > building. HAVE_GTK/HAVE_GNOME are meant to be used within ports' Makefiles and > not defined in make.conf. If you want to disable optional gnome support within > ports, you should defined WITHOUT_GNOME. Then I should bring my apologies. I don't remember the reason why I initially added HAVE_GTK into make.conf (now I see this was wrong), but as it was always defined, it led to wrong naming of packages :-( > Jeremy Regards, Anton -- Anton Voronin Ural Regional Center of FREEnet, Southern Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message