From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 09:42:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C6D37B404 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DDB43F85 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:42:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6HGgcju047432; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6HGgcw1047431; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:42:37 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20030717164237.GB47198@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030717080805.GA98878@dragon.nuxi.com> <7365.1058459147@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7365.1058459147@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Things to remove from /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 16:42:41 -0000 On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:25:47PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >- swapon, this is not needed to fix a whacked out /lib.... unless we add > > Emacs to /resuce. > > swapon should stay, various programs which build filesystem trees > in memory can become quite hungry. Does 'swapon' need to be run first in order for 'mdmfs' to work? I suspect so; but want to know for sure. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)