From owner-freebsd-questions Mon May 12 01:17:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA05936 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 12 May 1997 01:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (gatekeeper.barcode.co.il [192.116.93.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA05931 for ; Mon, 12 May 1997 01:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nadav@localhost) by gatekeeper.barcode.co.il (8.8.5/8.6.12) id LAA26314; Mon, 12 May 1997 11:14:03 +0300 (IDT) Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 11:14:03 +0300 (IDT) From: Nadav Eiron To: Obelisk@DAL.net cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 11 May 1997 Obelisk@DAL.net wrote: > I stated my question incorrectly, basically is SMP support safe enough to > use on a daily basis, as I am getting a dual p200 pro and don't wanna use > Linux *EG* Thanks! Depends on what you do with it. SMP is integrated into 3.0-current, so it is *at least* as dangerous as running -current. If you feel current will do, subscribe to the smp and current lists and ask there. They'll probably give you a better answer. It might also depend on the hardware you're using. Personaly I don't think I'll run a production server on 3.0/SMP just yet, but that's *my* personal opinion. [gigantic .signature snipped] Nadav