Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Apr 2018 03:24:44 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 227600] porter's handbook: use of distinfo
Message-ID:  <bug-227600-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D227600

            Bug ID: 227600
           Summary: porter's handbook: use of distinfo
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: freebsd@dreamchaser.org

If you have a distinfo file that does not match the tarball you are attempt=
ing
to fetch, the ports mechanism fails fetching the tarball with the following
misleading message:

=3D> nufraw-0.41.tar.gz is not in
/hd2/home/garya/Computing/ports/graphics/nufraw/distinfo.
=3D> Either /hd2/home/garya/Computing/ports/graphics/nufraw/distinfo is out=
 of
date, or
=3D> nufraw-0.41.tar.gz is spelled incorrectly.

In the general description of the fetch phase, it should mention that if a
distinfo file is present, it *must* match the tarball being fetched.  I had=
 the
impression distinfo was only used after the tarball was fetched, during the
extract phase.  When upgrading a port it's easy to forget there is already a
distinfo lying around.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-227600-7788>