From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May 15 13:05:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3711F16A4CE; Sat, 15 May 2004 13:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B7E8A43D39; Sat, 15 May 2004 13:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4FK4UuC007451;
	Sat, 15 May 2004 16:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i4FK4UbB007448;
	Sat, 15 May 2004 16:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 16:04:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040515200401.GB845@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040515160353.7388A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: jail and chflags [patch]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 20:05:14 -0000

On Sat, 15 May 2004, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:

> +> +> comments? yeahs? neys?
> +> 
> +> Whoa! This looks very serious.
> 
> Ok, false alarm:) After discussion with rwatson@ and cperciva@, it looks
> that changing those flags is permitted due to per-jail securelevels,
> which were intruduced in 5.x. 

However, we might want to think about setting the securelevel in a jail to
at least 1 on creation for compatibility reasons...

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research