From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue May 29 04:34:50 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB18FB767A; Tue, 29 May 2018 04:34:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291D57617B; Tue, 29 May 2018 04:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id w4T4Ymxx007269 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 28 May 2018 21:34:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-4-131-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.131.132] claimed to be yv.noip.me Reply-To: yuri@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r471061 - head/audio/qjackctl To: Alexey Dokuchaev , Sean Bruno Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201805281845.w4SIj8bO065379@repo.freebsd.org> <985846ee-dce7-d8f1-2813-0a28bc36217e@freebsd.org> <5dddd567-3439-caa3-56d0-665a40bdbf35@freebsd.org> <77503afc-b631-ac32-a87b-c8a28e0bb2ab@freebsd.org> <20180529023326.GA20771@FreeBSD.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 21:34:47 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180529023326.GA20771@FreeBSD.org> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.26 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 04:34:50 -0000 On 05/28/18 19:33, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > That's exactly the right approach here: leave both options, let the user > choose. I'm still defaulting my ports to Qt4 (at least trying to), and > sometimes even provide -qt4 as a separate port. I'm perfectly happy with > Qt4, less happy with Qt5, and see no need to use Qt5. But I'm just as > happy with Qt5 being default*as long as* I can tell the port that I want > Qt4 instead. > > Removing working option just because it's not useful for you Yuri is not > your best act here, esp. after you've been explicitly asked for it. You didn't show that sticking to Qt4 is specifically useful for anybody for valid reasons though. You only stated your dislike of Qt5 without reasons. Please show that switch of the app to Qt5 actually harms anybody, causes them loss of time, functionality, pain or suffering, or any other adverse consequences. So far all I see is that all the apps that I use work in Qt5 the same way or better than in Qt4. Yuri