From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 12 12:17:43 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DCF4A37B401; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 45B0943FBD; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from melange (melange.errno.com [66.127.85.82])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3CJHfpw077488
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Message-ID: <0a2201c30128$30e43e50$52557f42@errno.com>
From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com>
To: "Nate Lawson" <nate@root.org>,
	"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
References: <25540.1050174072@critter.freebsd.dk>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:17:41 -0700
Organization: Errno Consulting
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4920.2300
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:17:44 -0000

> Second, I have discussed this particular change with ken@,
> who as you correctly point out is the maintainer, and he
> agreed that the function was unused.
>

Then why wasn't ken@ referenced in your commit msg?

> So I really don't know why or what compelled you to attack me here,
> whatever it was: please try to control it better in the future.

Given your past history of summarily axing and/or modifying code w/o
consulting folks I can see why someone might respond as Nate did.  If you
had noted that Ken had reviewed your changes I expect this never would have
happened.  Both parties are at fault here; consider the view from the other
side too.

    Sam