From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 19 20:10:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98B137B4D7 for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 20:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13mSZU-000161-00; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:10:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:10:16 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: "Scot W. Hetzel" Cc: FreeBSD-Ports Subject: Re: New bsd.apache.mk Message-ID: <20001019221016.N2163@FreeBSD.org> References: <200010200259.VAA00433@wbiw01.westbend.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200010200259.VAA00433@wbiw01.westbend.net>; from hetzels@westbend.net on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:59:01PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 09:59:01PM -0500, Scot W. Hetzel wrote: > The purpose of bsd.apache.mk is to make it easier to create an > Apache Module port, as well as to remove redundant code from > the existing Apache Module ports. > > Does any changes need to be made before I send-pr it? Patches for bsd.port.mk to hook in bsd.apache.mk if required, patches for at least some of the existing apache-related ports to make use of these new features, etc., etc. Does any of this bsd.apache.mk help any with the progress towards a single www/apache port and followup www/mod_ssl ? > I would also like to nominate that a new virtual category be > created called "apache", since there currently are 32 Apache > related port. Different issue. Worthy of a separate email to keep these things seperate. My vote would be "no" for now, btw, simply because I do not believe that www should be sub-categorized just yet. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message