Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 10:43:26 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 207253] cad/openvsp: Fix in 11-CURRENT Message-ID: <bug-207253-29464-A0iTamZTNs@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-207253-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-207253-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207253 Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fernando.apesteguia@gmail.c | |om Attachment #167391| |maintainer-approval?(fernan Flags| |do.apesteguia@gmail.com) --- Comment #13 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 167391 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D167391&action= =3Dedit Enclose array in a namespace (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #11)=20 > Well, try to report this to libc++ upstream, and see what they say. I do= n't > much feel like hacking our local copy with some change that will conflict > with whatever upstream is doing, let alone that we cannot do anything abo= ut > the existing copies of libc++ out there. OK. I was hoping you'd be willing to do that as it happened a few other tim= es in the past. (In reply to fernando.apesteguia from comment #12) > What strikes me is that the very same software works on FreeBSD 9.x and 1= 0.x > without issues > (http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=3Dcad&portname=3Dop= envsp). > So something must have changed in libc++. I'm afraid we can break other > software as stupid as they can be using names. I think it's worth having a > look at what it changed around July 2015 that was when the port started > failing. What changed is that libc++ and the rest of clang/LLVM were updated to more recent versions during that period, and these new versions introduced the changes that are breaking OpenVSP. > I'm working on the port of OpenVSP 3.0 but it requires the addition of ot= her > ports first and it will take a while. In the meantime I would rather comp= ile > OpenVSP with gcc as the patch purposes instead of working on a new patch = for > the code. Please take a look at this patch I'm attaching. It builds fine on HEAD for = me, and doesn't force the use of GCC. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207253-29464-A0iTamZTNs>