Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:39:17 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r422505 - head/archivers/snappy-java Message-ID: <1db2352b-f6b6-ba58-d18d-7d1eac5c4c0f@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3bbaf8af-e9d0-9fce-b103-2055bdce8e18@marino.st> References: <201609201519.u8KFJrTF059560@repo.freebsd.org> <ec547bd4-0930-f39c-7a36-6462c7ad4517@FreeBSD.org> <3bbaf8af-e9d0-9fce-b103-2055bdce8e18@marino.st>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --u3KWKd0uEJQAIh2BcSm1naViXnf6fJ6pu Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="iK736XNgAWNJI6GhJNsQGecgJivvxRNln"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: marino@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1db2352b-f6b6-ba58-d18d-7d1eac5c4c0f@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r422505 - head/archivers/snappy-java References: <201609201519.u8KFJrTF059560@repo.freebsd.org> <ec547bd4-0930-f39c-7a36-6462c7ad4517@FreeBSD.org> <3bbaf8af-e9d0-9fce-b103-2055bdce8e18@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <3bbaf8af-e9d0-9fce-b103-2055bdce8e18@marino.st> --iK736XNgAWNJI6GhJNsQGecgJivvxRNln Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 21/09/2016 =C3=A0 15:19, John Marino a =C3=A9crit : > On 9/21/2016 03:19, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> Le 20/09/2016 =C3=A0 17:19, John Marino a =C3=A9crit : >>> Author: marino >>> Date: Tue Sep 20 15:19:52 2016 >>> New Revision: 422505 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/422505 >>> >>> Log: >>> archivers/snappy-java: new fedora MASTER_SITE to unbreak >> >> I'm picking a commit at random. >> >> If our distcache is not a valid upstream, then someone else's distcach= e >> is not either. > > It doesn't look like a cache to me. It looks like that, unlike > FreeBSD, they keep a copy of distribution tarballs that they use.=20 > It's not a cache, but a primary repository. > > That's what it looks like to me. If you know that it's definitively > just a cache, that might change the story. =46rom what I can gather, it is the cache fedora uses for building their packages, a bit like what our distcache is. So, well, yes, it is a cache. Like the ubuntu cache you are also using on launchpad.net. or the rpmfusion thing you also found. Trying to go around every rule and policy we have is really getting old. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --iK736XNgAWNJI6GhJNsQGecgJivvxRNln-- --u3KWKd0uEJQAIh2BcSm1naViXnf6fJ6pu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJX4o2FXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IkZEP/24+Z1qiKIQjGV92OmNSRmv7 ZnlvK4rNR5VX8Zcjj2owRxZjPq7qth5D9Tjd2t1xNtDrrn3V8fH34mCltCsGU7Yh OhTdDxzLWtB3GnwNBuSQE7MRcOZISLurT4L9r6Z7NoCj8+cs+wqTgQu4TaN67kwl TykOnKkjXGRLIpOUZUhUjiJn4MzNuMuI6rCIGVL6ydFee/v3khxGvPBrpLQeUtMU 5IfFLGBFkdwFAeqE0ee3M8GKTWaOrTRJWygQtipctbdRgA4Mh7DMLbz8UTXEW9om BatI08ZMifmrU5gVw1irzHTLYRDPqU9kOaCt5vkMs0p4YSuComHYAqhvmBp/aTue /ULViRXaXeFWhpzLJ3ytNSh8x9bkDz9OyX4mx+OEHAadUEgGJoDs9ueI0wg0vS8O 41/KyvUt475dTAAKJQbP59gKKMJTXljylNVibOC8/8KPW82Ueu1B3/euAOJgGTuH vBRYOe7uL+WKjWl/iWPJWC0eju1J8Jj+f3WsRuT2R+jip0CJEZmbWT8cZfW4KFPp I6kYwrrMn7stWVRyyIijcTUiCDEyNETPVfEOY7GY1zxw+XmMiLXNqiymhnWwXQJe uPmUEF/uq9sPjcLjIUycbPuf1ELJ7b2YnvGTn9K3hybUrX8bKq8fIvwKrxDgTLz0 CkKJ2r6c3D7194jFF1il =EDVG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3KWKd0uEJQAIh2BcSm1naViXnf6fJ6pu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1db2352b-f6b6-ba58-d18d-7d1eac5c4c0f>