From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Nov 28 10:40:22 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA25491
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:40:22 -0800
Received: from netcom22.netcom.com (bakul@netcom22.netcom.com [192.100.81.136])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA25485
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:40:19 -0800
Received: from localhost by netcom22.netcom.com (8.6.12/Netcom)
	id KAA12261; Tue, 28 Nov 1995 10:37:51 -0800
Message-Id: <199511281837.KAA12261@netcom22.netcom.com>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch),
        freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users)
Subject: Re: select() and setrlimit() broken 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 28 Nov 95 09:34:52 PST."
             <1124.817580092@time.cdrom.com> 
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 95 10:37:44 -0800
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@netcom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > 	Does anyone know if select() and setrlimit() is broken in -CURRENT sinc
> > they don't behave the way they should as compared to every other UN*X 
> > variant.  Any info would be helpful.  Thanks!

Don't know about setrlimit() but I did notice that rlim_max is 0
under {Free,Net}BSD.  On most other systems it is >= rlim_cur.

-Vince- should describe exactly what the problem is if he
expects any help.