From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri May 6 22:08:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA391B31794; Fri, 6 May 2016 22:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 680B417A3; Fri, 6 May 2016 22:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a17so97904365wme.0; Fri, 06 May 2016 15:08:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WbT92qOfE2u6RXHbaAj+uMcvYAlxZISldfHckfV/r/M=; b=CgHhrSD/mlB8GqVta0ufASgSyF9Lj8I37wKiPk++WQ/f9ZoXrdq/U1a0ylbmEnJO/j mkeusXjjKunseF2a+WWdHd9MQKwL77/5li4wNWbJd2w7if0tcfQYvWZwJ21tQNsbo+q0 TP4aJHxqVGikX1FFct8NZ/xEToovDmbYEfuQ+AErK38QuHPWMaFOnPZ9AKGQbHGW76la kxxQI9lGHS+Jm7KZtPBvtc+k3foBc93s4tE3pHSnahsLAIEmphaZUd0/9nVCmBYYIhtk WucXAuAaj7fFtvoXTfHv9Q6Ympf2rwyhn9fQCh4uZiOlaPIPQiJPxJH5RRzffZkVCRLq 7rMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WbT92qOfE2u6RXHbaAj+uMcvYAlxZISldfHckfV/r/M=; b=YVmXQUwxo0h8APLiK+90HafGMbFNnHsFpQ53hzbEnmvQ+cU8YWAB4UsVf25+d5ifDR 7ML4Lv0Xq19k2OraoyeCz+lxBCbD5JZs1B+mi4uiNPwWnfjm6PtUiwAnQS0obOGFgSrs 2S5ng1Y3fmI7ARVJP1KrBcBSXw3ri5RdhJByyJVMPsbpKTi72QrBGbII9jlyyBzrXzgY /8pvnIfoXEeNLTVpqAA8bKfk85U2TuKGv2Yr0cRm0dYdK2GKhBtQm07v6NcRy5gGW+5W PmO/19z17enE1ltZb0DgdCVvxFMI539k8OnAvY6Aeq8jNoyBGbB/xaYSYnHu+VexjBBH yqgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX++H4bKGwvEXMxyBvGZLCn/plvaY6l/jmVdSmSO8lNj8vfvRbwhahRoSvoKncLTjH+MLxvHs1IggTaSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.203.138 with SMTP id kq10mr22412409wjc.155.1462572509027; Fri, 06 May 2016 15:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.16.201 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 00:08:28 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase From: Ben Woods To: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 22:08:31 -0000 Hi everyone, The commit in r299088 changes the behaviour for building multiple kernels when the KERNCONF value contains multiple (space-separated) kernel conf names. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=299088 When PkgBase was announced by Glen Barber in March, note 4 of his email stated that multiple kernels would be built and packaged if multiple are listed in KERNCONF. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkgbase/2016-March/000032.html Can I please clarify the desired behaviour so that I can update the PkgBase wiki article accordingly? I personally think it is quite a neat feature to build multiple kernels if they are listed in KERNCONF. Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com