From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 17 11:50: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5521B37B404; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AEF643E8A; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 11:49:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.2] (vpn-client-2.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.2]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8HIkoiv058897; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:46:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: jerry@thehutt.org Cc: Joe Kelsey , freebsd-gnome , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020917184537.GA22391@nomad.thehutt.org> References: <3D8775E9.4050409@mail.flyingcroc.net> <1032287836.331.66.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> <20020917184537.GA22391@nomad.thehutt.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 Date: 17 Sep 2002 14:49:50 -0400 Message-Id: <1032288591.331.71.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,AWL version=2.31 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 14:45, Jerry A! wrote: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:37:15PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > : On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 14:35, Joe Kelsey wrote: > : > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 02:07:38PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > : > > > : > > > Okay, what about this: > : > > > > : > > > mozilla-vendor --> 1.0.x > : > > > mozilla --> latest official release (1.1 now) > : > > > mozilla-devel --> latest pre-release (1.2a now) > : > > > > : > > > : > > That seems to be the most reasonable way to do it if we have all of > : > > them in the ports tree. This sure did turn out to be a can of worms. > : > > :) > : > > > : > : Okay, in exactly 1 hour, I will make the necessary repo copy requests to > : cvs@ and portmgr@. That's 15:37 EDT. If anyone objects, speak now or > : for a long time, hold your peace. > > Could you please give some thought as to how to name > /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla before you make the repo copy? For instance, > should it be a symlink to /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla-${ver} or what? > > The reason I ask is b/c ports like flashplugin-mozilla and plugger break > if /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla doesn't exist. I thought of keeping things in line with the way they are now. That is: ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla --> mozilla-1.1 ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla-devel --> mozilla-1.2a ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla-vendor --> mozilla-1.0.1 Similar directories for the headers. How's that? Joe > > Thanks for all your hard work. > > --Jerry > > Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... > ...It's much more important than that! > -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message