Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:09:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HAMMER FS port (status ?) Message-ID: <permail-200909241509231e86ffa800002c7c-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> In-Reply-To: <86fxac62il.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav schrieb am 2009-09-24: > Alexander Best <alexbestms@math.uni-muenster.de> writes: > > i remember a discussion about HAMMER support on one of the > > mailingslists which > > sorta ended with the following statement: > > "let's get zfs running properly before we even think about starting > > with > > HAMMER." > Not a valid argument; regardless of the state of ZFS, one does not > preclude the other unless you expect the same person to handle both. > The one and only reason why HAMMER is not in the base system is that > nobody has stepped forward to do it. > DES my thoughts exactly. i'd really like to use HAMMER as a ufs2 replacement on= my box. zfs seems like a great fs but to me it seems too complicated to be handled by the average user. i'm really looking forward to the first few lines of code in p4. ;) cheers. alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?permail-200909241509231e86ffa800002c7c-a_best01>