From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 7 15:39:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98067643 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65B21CD7 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 15:39:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id rl12so4457980iec.36 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:39:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BRS/o8wgIG6NwcPb/uAneKWVnD4mTaOQMmMZRfiVrqQ=; b=D4pqBvoCQQdFyXOJBpxQ/ZXGhgIYu7oqFLzjj6buxz5CREqBpwoJjfb901zTgcqeGK tTV63sHSwwQs123vk02OGlV4cEeX77TvYpjpqmcfTdGBETmHIuboHatYEl7vv9KhWTB8 PRXD6HnjwzZtl5DT7D3Xtx+xjvUrXivPT4CvA7rB4d+fff5E3rGMFO3x7hYctcMRQqlg OBMPC4cr5SOw2RlmX2eUHaLis38BceQdLDQFg+XgWwFSIv00SX4VbZ3bCE/l1f4djlg3 OF+IZUsnhTSbecjQCumFlo2Xe7uD15UXZ+O+CO7Ym0DXh72TZaPL1rR39fazhdcaYuyQ HG7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.119.132 with SMTP id ku4mr3405547igb.35.1394206768355; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:39:28 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.60.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:39:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <15A20437-032F-421D-BF2A-503E71F63E70@shaw.ca> References: <15A20437-032F-421D-BF2A-503E71F63E70@shaw.ca> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:39:28 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8IEe6HjgniJHbAfnOei6MrLdKtM Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 + Apache + PHP From: Rick Miller To: Dale Scott Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:39:29 -0000 On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Dale Scott wrote: > So far as I am aware, php5 must be built from ports only if you need to > build mod_php for apache. If you use php-fpm with apache you can use binary > packages for everything. I'm trying to work through a packages-only system > with nginx, php, php extensions, and MariaDB/MySQL) all installed using > binary packages. I'm hoping that using pkg to upgrade binary packages will > be a huge time savings over "postmaster -af", but the critical thing (from > what I've read) is to have a 100% binary packages system (with absolutely > nothing from ports). > > Certainly it has been shown hybrid solutions are possible, but I'd rather > be a dumb user and spend more time on app dev. I had hoped that I could install mod_php (or at least the shared objects in libexec/apache/) via package, without having to resort to ports. I too want to manage hosts exclusively with binary packages. In the absence of a working a Poudriere implementation, it appears I will have to install it via ports. :( Thanks for the info. -- Take care Rick Miller