Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:52:32 -0500
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andrew Wilcox <AWilcox@Wilcox-Tech.com>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Current status of utimensat(2)
Message-ID:  <54C97640.1080203@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <005701d03b53$92796ce0$b76c46a0$@Wilcox-Tech.com>
References:  <005701d03b53$92796ce0$b76c46a0$@Wilcox-Tech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 01/28/2015 18:38, Andrew Wilcox wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am wondering about the current status of the utimensat(2) and 
> futimens(2) patch set.  I saw some posts from early 2013 but 
> nothing more recent.  In addition to improving POSIX 2008 
> compliance, this will additionally enable me to continue my work on
> the Linuxulator.  As it stands, most Gentoo and Ubuntu binaries do
> not work in the Linuxulator because of the missing utimensat 
> syscall.
> 
> Is anyone currently working on this?  I'd be happy to help out.

AFAICT, the patch was improved and committed to head:

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277610

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUyXZAAAoJEHyflib82/FGUHcH/2QAH1hqLkB6dmbGcQmVR8cm
tprNVhqJkmetNYr5YyomtrIRUe1OzqO66cUSgMrsraRhkni8ZhIt40GhjKI16l2G
ci6z25+TkigPwGzVaKie9exhduVMFCHOdnFntv841logaUWSgZY5LcrCSl6RZJrG
T3kA4s2V45geVRLkRx4tNJM97b4mC4TSOdoB4UYn64BDCHING/o/P6YJwXkRd0Cs
QmAQTaLtwHXJLWLmFEsv5OzrUJ8JzqLuPAMnuvRL9b1w9quuh7I6wK64A65sF4uI
l1U4Pli1TWk4NINYwoJthOdnfLFDmVdSC5Jn/8y29OchdJ6yOkm3XyDvr0bn2uY=
=ksFx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54C97640.1080203>