Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:52:00 -0600 From: Lonnie VanZandt <lonnie.vanzandt@ngc.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing a step in new(er) Remote gdb/kdb setup? Message-ID: <200508111052.01305.lonnie.vanzandt@ngc.com> In-Reply-To: <1E8A49C9-D0E7-43CF-A3AC-CEA50B1A3135@xcllnt.net> References: <200508040940.56172.lonnie.vanzandt@ngc.com> <200508111009.53939.lonnie.vanzandt@ngc.com> <1E8A49C9-D0E7-43CF-A3AC-CEA50B1A3135@xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
forgive me for grasping for straws, but, might I hope that those fixes are related to segfaults on initial connections? ;-) If so, what is the nature of the fix? On Thursday 11 August 2005 10:47 am, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Aug 11, 2005, at 9:09 AM, Lonnie VanZandt wrote: > > Marcel, > > > > The protocol sync issue is now gone - but the host side kgdb > > core dumps > > immediately after reporting the current break point of the target: > > *snip* > > > Is there a kgdb patch/update for 5.4 release p3 that I should > > apply? Or > > perhaps some permission/resource issue on the host that needs to be > > corrected? > > I committed a couple of fixes to -current, which I plan to merge to > RELENG_6 > in a couple of days. I'll merge to RELENG_5 as well then.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508111052.01305.lonnie.vanzandt>