From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Jul 23 12:05:40 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA07526
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [209.21.136.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA07516;
          Wed, 23 Jul 1997 12:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell1.cybercom.net (ksmm@shell1.cybercom.net [209.21.136.6]) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA16515; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:02:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (ksmm@localhost) by shell1.cybercom.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA20248; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 15:19:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net>
Reply-To: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net>
To: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: -current report. :) (moved to chat/questions)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970723110250.6657X-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970723151435.20032A-100000@shell1.cybercom.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 23 Jul 1997, Jaye Mathisen wrote:

 : Well, I took the plunge, and upgraded my crash-ridden 2.2.2 INN newsserver
 : to 3.0-current as of 7/19, and it's been solid as the proverbial rock
 : for a few days now.

Okay, see, now you've got me worried.  What crashes?  I convinced my IS
manager to let me set up our news server with FreeBSD rather than NT.  I'm
using 2.2.1, but I read that 2.2.2 fixes some problems with using an
Adaptec 2940 under a heavy load, so I thought I'd upgrade to the latest
release.  And now you tell me this?

So, from your experience, should I upgrade to 2.2.2 or should I stick it
out with 2.2.1?  I don't think 3.0-current is much of an option for me.

K.S.