Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:17:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Ian Freislich <ianf@za.uu.net> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE nice bugs are fixed. Message-ID: <20030411141630.B37530-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <667.1050063441@wcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Ian Freislich wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > Could those of you that have been testing it so far please try it out > > again and let me know how it feels? > > ../../../kern/sched_ule.c: In function `sched_clock': > ../../../kern/sched_ule.c:927: structure has no member named `ksq_rslice' > > $FreeBSD: src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v 1.22 2003/04/11 03:47:14 jeff Exp $ > > Is this the right version of the file? I don't know enough about > the scheduler to be sure this is the right fix, but I suspect it > should be kseq->ksq_rslices if the struct kseq definition is anything > to go by. > > --- sched_ule.c.orig Fri Apr 11 12:10:56 2003 > +++ sched_ule.c Fri Apr 11 11:45:02 2003 > @@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ > */ > ke->ke_slice--; > #ifdef SMP > - kseq->ksq_rslice--; > + kseq->ksq_rslices--; > #endif > > if (ke->ke_slice > 0) > > > It compiles after this change, but didn't come back after reboot. > I'm no where near the machine at the moment, so I don't know why > it hasn't come up. > > Ian Oh, right, you did the right thing there. I just didn't have a SMP machine available for testing the last round of changes. I'll look into this. Cheers, Jeff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030411141630.B37530-100000>