Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 11:39:47 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> Subject: Re: aliasing (or renaming) kern.geom.debugflags Message-ID: <351747006.20111009113947@serebryakov.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <32968.1318145841@critter.freebsd.dk> References: Your message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:31:28 %2B0400." <1644928028.20111008143128@serebryakov.spb.ru> <32968.1318145841@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Poul-Henning. You wrote 9 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 11:37:21: >> So, every other GEOM class should have special knowledge about GPT? >>It doesn't look like "topology-agnostic" GEOM way :) > That's mostly because GPT by design does not try to play nice. I understand that... See my proposal in other thread (renamed to "MBR, GPT and their co-existence with other GEOM classes"). --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?351747006.20111009113947>