From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 20 00:44:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA367106564A; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from merlin.alerce.com (merlin.alerce.com [64.62.142.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE638FC08; Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:44:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from merlin.alerce.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8640A33C62; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:44:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from merlin.alerce.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by merlin.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E3433C5B; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:44:44 -0800 (PST) From: George Hartzell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18845.64765.71312.244570@almost.alerce.com> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:44:45 -0800 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20090219203541.GB2083@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <18845.40641.33220.936902@almost.alerce.com> <20090219181114.GA57360@freebsd.org> <20090219203541.GB2083@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12 under 22.1.50.1 (i386-apple-darwin8.11.1) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:31:57 +0000 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, goran.lowkrantz@ismobile.com, Roman Divacky , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, George Hartzell Subject: Re: Patch for 'zfs send -R' core dump (pr bin/130105) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: hartzell@alerce.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:44:46 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek writes: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:11:14PM +0100, Roman Divacky wrote: > > > > btw.... I track the opensolaris hg at work and there's a quite a few commits > > to zfs (almost) every week. fixing coredumps and other problems. > > > > maybe we can track the opensolaris a little closer? > > It is beeing tracked very close, I'd say, in perforce > (//depot/user/pjd/zfs/...). > > The problem is that trivial fixes are mixed with very intrusive changes, > so it is too risky to track it even in HEAD (I'm running HEAD on my > ZFS-only laptop!). OpenSolaris development is also very different from > FreeBSD's. We use to describe every single change very carefully in > commit logs, where OpenSolaris commits are based only on bug number and > bug descriptions. Many changes are committed at once, so it is hard to > pick only some changes. Is it possible for fixes like the one that I posted to get merged into -CURRENT w/out waiting for your next mega-relase? On the one hand it would be very useful, on the other I can imagine that if it happens too often it would make your life difficult. g.