Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Nov 2022 19:26:32 -0500
From:      Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   GRE in a fib via rc.conf
Message-ID:  <CAMXt9NbgFUiGuQNbcQ8mj5RaYw9KiW_SxccfVYvgom2%2BnBev_Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
All
  I am looking for some help on if my setup makes sense.
I have a vm with two interfaces. One for access to the host , we'll call
this mgmt . One for routing traffic, we'll call this routing . I want to
put the routing interface into a fib and to run a gre tunnel over it.
Sounds simple enough.  The problem I am seeing is that it looks like the
tunneled traffic is leaked into the default fib and I don't see why. I am
not sure if this is config nit or if this is an issue. Should the gre10
interface be in fib 1 ?  See below.

### RC CONF ###
ifconfig_vmx0="inet 10.23.121.253/24 description mgmt"
ifconfig_vmx1="inet 100.65.101.14/28 mtu 9000 description routing fib 1"
defaultrouter="10.23.121.1"
static_routes="ewr10gresrc"
route_ewr10gresrc=" 192.168.255.14 100.65.101.1 -fib 1"
cloned_interfaces="gre10"
ifconfig_gre10=" inet 100.67.103.2 100.67.103.1 netmask 255.255.255.252
tunnel 100.65.101.14 192.168.255.14 tunnelfib 1"
###############

### DEFAULT FIB ###
~ # netstat -nr4Wl
Routing tables

Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Nhop# Mtu Netif Expire
default 10.23.121.1 UGS 6 1500 vmx0
10.23.121.0/24 link#1 U 2 1500 vmx0
10.23.121.253 link#1 UHS 3 16384 lo0
100.67.103.1 link#4 UH 4 1476 gre10
100.67.103.2 link#4 UHS 5 16384 lo0
127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 1 16384 lo0

### FIB 1 ###

# setfib 1 netstat -nr4Wl
Routing tables (fib: 1)

Internet:
Destination Gateway Flags Nhop# Mtu Netif Expire
100.65.101.0/28 link#2 U 1 9000 vmx1
100.65.101.14 link#2 UHS 2 16384 lo0
127.0.0.1 link#3 UHS 3 16384 lo0
192.168.255.14 100.65.101.1 UGHS 4 9000 vmx1

##### PING EXAMPLES #####

# setfib 1 ping -c 1 -t 2 100.67.103.1
PING 100.67.103.1 (100.67.103.1): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host

--- 100.67.103.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
# setfib 0 ping -c 1 -t 2 100.67.103.1
PING 100.67.103.1 (100.67.103.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 100.67.103.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.528 ms

--- 100.67.103.1 ping statistics ---
1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.528/1.528/1.528/0.000 ms

#### TCPDUMP ####
ICMP packets are in fact sourced from the gre10 interface.
The GRE packets are also only going out the routing interface.

See the following pastebin for details.

https://pastebin.com/n3mGXGHA




-- 
mark saad | nonesuch@longcount.org

[-- Attachment #2 --]
<div dir="ltr"><div>All</div><div>  I am looking for some help on if my setup makes sense. <br></div><div>I
 have a vm with two interfaces. One for access to the host , we&#39;ll call 
this mgmt . One for routing traffic, we&#39;ll call this routing . I want to
 put the routing interface into a fib and to run a gre tunnel over it. 
Sounds simple enough.  The problem I am seeing is that it looks like the
 tunneled traffic is leaked into the default fib and I don&#39;t see why. I 
am not sure if this is config nit or if this is an issue. Should the 
gre10 interface be in fib 1 ?  See below. <br></div><div><br></div><div><div>### RC CONF ###
</div><div>ifconfig_vmx0=&quot;inet <a href="http://10.23.121.253/24" target="_blank">10.23.121.253/24</a> description mgmt&quot;
</div><div>ifconfig_vmx1=&quot;inet <a href="http://100.65.101.14/28" target="_blank">100.65.101.14/28</a> mtu 9000 description routing fib 1&quot;
</div><div>defaultrouter=&quot;10.23.121.1&quot;
</div><div>static_routes=&quot;ewr10gresrc&quot;
</div><div>route_ewr10gresrc=&quot; 192.168.255.14 100.65.101.1 -fib 1&quot;
</div><div>cloned_interfaces=&quot;gre10&quot;
</div><div>ifconfig_gre10=&quot; inet 100.67.103.2 100.67.103.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 tunnel 100.65.101.14 192.168.255.14 tunnelfib 1&quot;
</div><div>###############
</div><div> </div><div>### DEFAULT FIB ###
</div><div> ~ # netstat -nr4Wl
</div><div>Routing tables
</div><div> </div><div>Internet:
</div><div>Destination        Gateway            Flags   Nhop#    Mtu      Netif Expire
</div><div>default            10.23.121.1        UGS         6   1500       vmx0
</div><div><a href="http://10.23.121.0/24" target="_blank">10.23.121.0/24</a>     link#1             U           2   1500       vmx0
</div><div>10.23.121.253      link#1             UHS         3  16384        lo0
</div><div>100.67.103.1       link#4             UH          4   1476      gre10
</div><div>100.67.103.2       link#4             UHS         5  16384        lo0
</div><div>127.0.0.1          link#3             UH          1  16384        lo0
</div><div> </div><div>### FIB 1 ###
</div><div> </div><div> # setfib 1 netstat -nr4Wl
</div><div>Routing tables (fib: 1)
</div><div> </div><div>Internet:
</div><div>Destination        Gateway            Flags   Nhop#    Mtu      Netif Expire
</div><div><a href="http://100.65.101.0/28" target="_blank">100.65.101.0/28</a>    link#2             U           1   9000       vmx1
</div><div>100.65.101.14      link#2             UHS         2  16384        lo0
</div><div>127.0.0.1          link#3             UHS         3  16384        lo0
</div><div>192.168.255.14     100.65.101.1       UGHS        4   9000       vmx1
</div><div> </div><div>##### PING EXAMPLES #####
</div><div> </div><div># setfib 1 ping -c 1 -t 2 100.67.103.1
</div><div>PING 100.67.103.1 (100.67.103.1): 56 data bytes
</div><div>ping: sendto: No route to host
</div><div> </div><div>--- 100.67.103.1 ping statistics ---
</div><div>1 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss
</div><div># setfib 0 ping -c 1 -t 2 100.67.103.1
</div><div>PING 100.67.103.1 (100.67.103.1): 56 data bytes
</div><div>64 bytes from <a href="http://100.67.103.1" target="_blank">100.67.103.1</a>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.528 ms
</div><div> </div><div>--- 100.67.103.1 ping statistics ---
</div><div>1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
</div><div>round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.528/1.528/1.528/0.000 ms
</div><div> </div><div>#### TCPDUMP ####
</div><div>ICMP packets are in fact sourced from the gre10 interface. 
</div>The GRE packets are also only going out the routing interface.</div><div><br></div><div>See the following pastebin for details.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://pastebin.com/n3mGXGHA" target="_blank">https://pastebin.com/n3mGXGHA</a><font color="#888888"><br></font></div><font color="#888888"><div><br><br></div></font><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">mark saad | <a href="mailto:nonesuch@longcount.org" target="_blank">nonesuch@longcount.org</a><br></div></div>

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAMXt9NbgFUiGuQNbcQ8mj5RaYw9KiW_SxccfVYvgom2%2BnBev_Q>