Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:29:07 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <sat@FreeBSD.org> To: "Martin Wilke" <miwi@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/p5-Net-Packet Makefile distinfo pkg-plist Message-ID: <cb5206420611180929j79a9651ek1f75dbafe1978f5e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061118165309.2e1229ab@miwi.homeunix.org> References: <200611181540.kAIFeDDU002274@repoman.freebsd.org> <20061118165309.2e1229ab@miwi.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/18/06, Martin Wilke <miwi@freebsd.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:40:13 +0000 (UTC) > Andrew Pantyukhin <sat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > sat 2006-11-18 15:40:13 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > net/p5-Net-Packet Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > Log: > > - Update to 3.22 > > Have you asked the maintainer for approval? Not quite, but we've been working for some time with Patrice and basically he's okay about me breaking his ports (I also maintain some of his CPAN modules). I often make commits without explicit approvals, sometimes by mistake (like the recent one to fluxbox-devel), but mostly when I'm sure that maintainers expect me to do that. The reason I omit the implicit approval tag sometimes is (1) I'm lazy and (2) that seems like just an extra bit of noise. I actually have a lengthier explanation on my mind, but again (1) I'm lazy to type it all here and (2) we need to move to another list to discuss it. Sorry for the confusion and thanks to your sharp eye!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420611180929j79a9651ek1f75dbafe1978f5e>