From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 09:47:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0332C16A4B3; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C09643FAF; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5ECFA45EAE; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:47:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 09:47:56 -0700 From: Will Andrews To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20030920164756.GL47671@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Eischen , threads@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org References: <200309201354.18392.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: kde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [kde-freebsd] Compiling arts in -CURRENT without -pthread X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 16:47:57 -0000 On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 10:53:04AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Yes, that's really strange. Are you sure that you have a correct > libc_r in /usr/lib? You seem to be building arts in the correct > manner, and -lc_r _should_ work. Dan, if PTHREAD_LIBS isn't defined, what library should 5.1C apps fall back to? It seems my 5.1C (2003/09/19) system does not have a libpthread, which I thought it was supposed to. So, please, tell me what a reasonable "default" would be to use if PTHREAD_LIBS is not defined. Is it -lkse? Why is FreeBSD not exporting an -lpthread like others seem to be? Regards, -- wca