From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Apr 29 04:45:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA11364
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 04:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nibsc.ac.uk (comsig.nibsc.ac.uk [193.62.43.13])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA11160
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 04:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk by nibsc.ac.uk via ESMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI.1(NIBSC))
	for <questions@freebsd.org> id MAA05264; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:38:25 +0100
Received: by chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk (950511.SGI.8.6.12.PATCH526/client-1.3.1(NIBSC))
	id MAA06915; Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:38:25 +0100
Message-Id: <199604291138.MAA06915@chalsig.nibsc.ac.uk>
Subject: SOC emulation and IBCS kernel options
To: questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 1996 12:38:24 +0100 (BST)
From: <mac@nibsc.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi,
	Could someone please save my sanity and give us a definitive
comprehensive answer to this one.

Just exactly what 'options' statements are/aren't needed for SCO emulation in
which versions of FreeBSD.  I have the strong feeling that 1.5.xx had no
suport, 2.0.5 had some with IBCS2, and COMPAT_IBCS is now used in 2.1R

Moreover, it seems that 2.2 (snaps) don't need it in the kernel at all.

Please someone authoritative (or at least well informed) clear this mess up.

P.S.  Whislt you're at it can you do the same with LINUX, COMPAT_LINUX,
LINUX_COMPAT etc. in 1.5, 2.0.5. 2.1R -stable and -current.  Ta.

                               Mac
          Assistant Systems Adminstrator @nibsc.ac.uk

                 mac@nibsc.ac.uk  (also postmaster)
 Work: 01707 654753 x 285               Everything else: 0956 237670 (any time)