From owner-freebsd-current Fri Dec 10 9:57:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C14E15026; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 09:57:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA23972; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:57:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA19772; Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:57:44 -0700 Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:57:44 -0700 Message-Id: <199912101757.KAA19772@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Smith Cc: Christopher Masto , Julian Elischer , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired! In-Reply-To: <199912082052.MAA00517@mass.cdrom.com> References: <19991208150807.A16687@netmonger.net> <199912082052.MAA00517@mass.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What we need here is a commitment to these new initiatives, not a lot of > fence-sitting and clutching our knitting to our chests. If all our users were developers I would agree. But *most* of our users are not developers. > Again, I say, think of what we're trying to achieve here. Good question. What are we trying to achieve here? I thought it was to provide the best OS that is usable to the largest number of users? Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message