From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 20:03:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931C416A42D for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:03:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Erin@Fortenberry.net) Received: from intake.emails-are.us (intake.emails-are.us [209.126.136.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E27543D68 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:03:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Erin@Fortenberry.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.webs-are.us [127.0.0.1]) by intake.emails-are.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1B15C22; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:26:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from intake.emails-are.us ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vhost.methodent.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52283-07; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:26:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from snkxwefortenbe (chfw02.scripps.com [207.203.254.110]) by intake.emails-are.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3438C5C1E; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:26:41 -0500 (EST) From: "Erin Fortenberry" To: "'Mikhail Teterin'" , Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:03:20 -0500 Message-ID: <003d01c652a2$aa64a520$1215450a@ad.ewsad.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 In-Reply-To: <200603281422.57389.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Thread-Index: AcZSi6IXI34b+9y2Q+a/fRszyd+uvgAFtzsw X-Virus-Scanned: by emails-are.us anti-virus X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.157, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] X-Spam-Score: -102.442 X-Spam-Level: Cc: Subject: RE: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:03:29 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Mikhail Teterin > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:23 PM > To: questions@freebsd.org > Cc: sendmail@sendmail.org > Subject: virtusertable blocking seems to have no effect > > Hi! > > I host a domain with a handful of "real" addresses. I > noticed, that spammers are using a variety of > random-generated names @mydomain and wish to block such > addresses with "No spam" responses instead of "User unknown". > > Here is (almost) what I have in the virtusertable: > > stol@example.com foo > hq@example.com bar > @example.com error:5.7.0:550 No spam, thanks > > I can see the "No spam,thanks" messages logged in the maillog > (without the space after coma, for some reason), but there is > no reject=550 message logged (which interferes with my other > software) and some of these messages seem to pass through > (although others are intercepted by other anti-spam defenses). > > For example, here are the only two log entries, that a spam > message generates: > > Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: > ... No spam,thanks > Mar 28 13:45:58 corbulon sendmail[40026]: k2SIjvvb040026: > from=, size=3305, class=0, nrcpts=0, > proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=example.example.net [xx.x.xx.xxx] > > Despite the "No spam,thanks" the message was accepted. > > What am I doing wrong? Thanks! Your users that are getting SPAM are in a BCC field.