From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 11:56:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EB21065672 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.questions@virtualhost.nl) Received: from mail.virtualhost.nl (mail.virtualhost.nl [89.200.201.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CF48FC16 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.questions@virtualhost.nl) Received: (qmail 25665 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2009 13:30:02 +0200 Received: from ip120-12-208-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl (HELO ?192.168.1.7?) (87.208.12.120) by mail.virtualhost.nl with SMTP; 30 Apr 2009 13:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: <49F98BB9.3020806@virtualhost.nl> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:30:01 +0200 From: Jeroen Hofstee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090321) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: output of ifconfig list scan X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:56:45 -0000 Inspired by the long "modern installer" thread I had a look at PC-BSD. I am one of the "lucky" owners of a Broadcom, Dell Wireless 1390 WLAN Mini-PCI Card and added the ndiswrapper to support it. I noticed that the PC-BSD tray icon could not scan the network for SSID, while ifconfig does return this list. It appears that the tool assumes SSID are reported as SSID, which is not the case here. My list is similar as listed in the handbook, so I guess it is not directly related to the ndiswrapper. Looking at ifconfig, it appears to me that the ieee80211 part queries the kernel and prints the returned values. I therefore assume that there are drivers, which report the session as SSID instead of session directly. Can someone confirm above is correct? If someone has a list with SSID could I get a copy of it (e.g. directly to my e-mail) so I don't break other things while fixing mine. Jeroen