From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 16 17:28:40 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA09954 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 17:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA09933; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 17:28:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from bofh.noc.best.net (rone@bofh.noc.best.net [205.149.163.54]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id PAA23690 ; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:49:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from rone@localhost) by bofh.noc.best.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) id PAA07355; Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:49:27 -0800 (PST) From: Ron Echeverri Message-Id: <199703162349.PAA07355@bofh.noc.best.net> Subject: Re: -current and -stable mailing lists In-Reply-To: <199703162206.PAA16084@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Mar 16, 97 03:06:11 pm" To: stable@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 16 Mar 1997 15:49:27 -0800 (PST) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Nate Williams writes: Where do we send bug reports and comments on 2.2 now that 2.2 is released? In the past -stable was 2.1.*, and -current was anything/everything else. Inquiring minds would like to know? Should we state that 2.2 is now -stable material, since I suspect it's at least as stable as the 2.1.0 release. Well, logically (well, my logic, for what that's worth), 3.0 should be under -current and 2.2 should be under -stable. 2.1-stable should be moved to -oldiebutgoodie or something like that. rone -- Ron Echeverri Best Internet Usenet Administration rone@best.net ############################################################################# INGREDIENT: Sodium benzoate (to preserve taste)