From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 19:30:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B2716A4CE for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:30:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662A643D31 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:30:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D35D1FF931; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:30:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 572331FF91D; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 21:30:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 83A1A1567C; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EE015329; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:26:58 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: John-Mark Gurney In-Reply-To: <20040817181307.GB99980@funkthat.com> Message-ID: References: <20040817072438.GA99980@funkthat.com> <41223F40.8030702@mcsi.pp.ru> <20040817181307.GB99980@funkthat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: Maxim Maximov cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new if_sk locking patch... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 19:30:10 -0000 On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > Does that also fix the "hangs" a lot of people can see ? > > I guess not ? > > Probably not... it only fixed the LOR's on attach... I just > got my card, but if you could get me a back trace on the hang, > I can look at it more... Though the hangs might be due to other > problems... it's not a problem of kernel hang but sk is up/active but no data passes the interface and established connections drop. In most cases connectivity comes back after some amount of time. See kern/69879. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT