From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 14 02:33:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C186516A4CE; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:33:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7499B43D49; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:33:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6E2XfkP012002 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:33:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i6E2XfIU011999; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:33:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:33:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200407140233.i6E2XfIU011999@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Panagiotis Astithas In-Reply-To: <40F3DDA0.9040108@ebs.gr> References: <40F3DDA0.9040108@ebs.gr> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:01:33 +0000 cc: FreeBSD Current cc: mike@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: [PATCH] Remove obsolete reference to X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 02:33:49 -0000 < said: > while doing some porting work I found that in src/sys/posix4/mqueue.h we > still include sys/_posix.h, despite having removed the relevant file in > 2002. This tiny patch should fix this: Not really. A better patch would apparently be to remove the file, since the function is not implemented; if it were implemented, more changes to the header than this would be required. -GAWollman