From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 10:51:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82ECDAB4 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0138.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24C641A12 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] (2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df) by CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1019.16; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:16:57 +0000 Message-ID: <540D8214.5070400@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 05:16:52 -0500 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: htop alternative References: <1410170060.62398.YahooMailNeo@web160702.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1410170060.62398.YahooMailNeo@web160702.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df] X-ClientProxiedBy: BN3PR0301CA0038.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.180.176) To CY1PR0301MB0841.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.163.147) X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:; X-Forefront-PRVS: 03283976A6 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019017)(6009001)(51704005)(24454002)(199003)(189002)(23676002)(81342001)(107046002)(110136001)(83072002)(86362001)(76176999)(105586002)(221733001)(80316001)(65956001)(80022001)(64706001)(59896002)(74502001)(75432001)(76482001)(95666004)(89122001)(92726001)(92566001)(87976001)(107886001)(21056001)(85852003)(2351001)(46102001)(85306004)(83322001)(65816999)(87266999)(50466002)(101416001)(20776003)(106356001)(50986999)(79102001)(47776003)(54356999)(88552001)(77982001)(33656002)(31966008)(74662001)(42186005)(90102001)(99396002)(4396001)(83506001)(102836001)(77096002)(97736003)(81542001)(111123002)(3826002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB0841; H:[IPv6:2601:2:4780:2fd:3cfa:1b41:db29:34df]; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:0; MX:1; LANG:en; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 10:51:43 -0000 On 2014.09.08 04:54, Laszlo Danielisz via freebsd-questions wrote: > Hi, > > Do you know any (Linux) htop alternative for FreeBSD? I'm not sure what exactly you mean, but I find myself switching between top and htop. htop has a more useful layout and is much nicer to look at, but it lacks some information in places (probably because it wasn't written with FreeBSD in mind too much), whereas top fills those gaps (it is written specifically for FreeBSD), but isn't as flexible in what it shows at one time or as pretty as htop. There are of course some other programs in base such as ps and procstat that can present information on processes in other ways.