From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 11 12:40:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9390737B402 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from InterJet.elischer.org ([12.232.206.8]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020311204019.QVXM2626.rwcrmhc51.attbi.com@InterJet.elischer.org>; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:40:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA64832; Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:29:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 12:29:19 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org Cc: Kris Kennaway , BOUWSMA Beery , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) In-Reply-To: <20020311104543.26176.qmail@web21110.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: > --- Kris Kennaway wrote: > > As you are no doubt aware there are significant infrastructural > > changes in -current relating to SMP scalability. It's in a very > > interim state at the moment, and one of the downsides is increased > > interrupt latency and lock contention for certain operations (yes, > > audio playback is one of them). > > > > Basically, it's a known issue. He also compared stable which also was much worse..... > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message