From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr 25 20:54:17 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA02630
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 20:54:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kalypso.cybercom.net (kalypso.cybercom.net [206.28.134.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA02619
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 20:54:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlanta (mfd-dial2-7.cybercom.net [206.28.134.71]) by kalypso.cybercom.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA00314; Fri, 25 Apr 1997 23:54:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1.5.4.32.19970426035451.006fa82c@cybercom.net>
X-Sender: ksmm@cybercom.net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 1.5.4 (32)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 1997 23:54:51 -0400
To: Joachim Kuebart <joa@kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de>, hackers@freebsd.org
From: The Classiest Man Alive <ksmm@cybercom.net>
Subject: Re: VFAT 32 support in msdosfs
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

At 04:55 PM 4/25/97 +0200, Joachim Kuebart wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Is there VFAT32 support in the current msdosfs? If not,m I'd be ready to try
>and do it..
>Note: From what I've heared, Windows95 that supports VFAT isn't even shipped
>any more. So this will probably be dying out soon.. :-)
>

Where'd you hear that?  Doesn't seem like Microsoft to just break the chain
of backward compatibility like that.

K.S.