Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:19:26 GMT From: Kalten <kalten@gmx.at> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/156832: ports-mgmt/portlint: length of COMMENT and Porter's Handbook discrepancy Message-ID: <201105051719.p45HJQ5P023060@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201105051720.p45HKArw055229@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 156832 >Category: ports >Synopsis: ports-mgmt/portlint: length of COMMENT and Porter's Handbook discrepancy >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: doc-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu May 05 17:20:10 UTC 2011 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Kalten >Release: 8.2-RELEASE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD freeHugin.Walhalla.Leben 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 2011 root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: johans and I happened to notice a little bug together: There is a discrepancy at the maximal allowed length of COMMENT according to: *) ports-mgmt/portlint/ [1] ( 70 characters) and *) The Porter's Handbook[2] (<60 characters). Please do decide ;-) Greetings, Kalten [1] ports/ports-mgmt/portlint/src/portlint.pl line 2754 [2] http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-comment.html >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201105051719.p45HJQ5P023060>